2016 Oscar Nominations—Best Actor

This year’s nominees are making for a lot of head-scratching in Hollywood. Best Picture and Best Director nominations are presenting a big challenge for predictors. The one “lock” this year, however, is the Best Actor category.

Nominees are:

Bryan Cranston, Trumbo

Leonardo DiCaprio, The Revenant

Matt Damon, The Martian

Michael Fassbender, Steve Jobs

Eddie Redmayne, The Danish Girl

Bryon Cranston’s nomination is a kind of “We loved, loved, loved you in Breaking Bad, so welcome to the movies, and you did a really solid job here in Trumbo.” Not a snowball’s chance in Hades for a win.

Matt Damon, who should have won the Oscar for The Informant!, wasn’t even nominated for that film. This is a great American actor who is so pleasant and sympathetic that we almost don’t notice that he create a myriad of complex and fascinating characters in a variety of genres. He’ll win someday, but this is a nod to his likability, this ability to carry a film almost single-handedly, and to the film itself. Sorry, Matt. You’ll get your Oscar for acting at some point.

Michael Fassbender’s nomination is a bit of a surprise—not because he didn’t deserve it, but because most folks thought this finely-acted film would be lost in the shuffle. Whatever buzz it had seemed to be nearly gone by nomination time. So it’s a joy to see this future Oscar-winner get a nomination. But it’s not Michael’s year yet.

Eddie Redmayne just won this award last year for The Theory of Everything. It’s not impossible to win two years in a row; both Spencer Tracy and Tom Hanks have done it. But while the first wave of admiration for the film included both Redmayne and Alicia Vikander, most of the enduring love has been aimed in her direction. One, it’s not a strong enough performance to overcome the reluctance to grant the award to an actor two years in a row. Two, it’s not his year.

It’s Leo’s year. Yes, he gave an amazing performance. It’s a triumph of endurance, to be sure, as well as a feat of acting skill to hold together a film of his epic scope with so few words. The sheer difficulty of pulling this all off is in Leo’s favor. But the bottom line is that it’s his time. He could have won from as far back as when he was 14 years old in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape. Everyone agrees that it’s award his year, and there is no stronger performance that could threaten his win. He will win, people will stand, people will clap for a long time. You can count on it.

Advertisements

About Mark DuPré

Full-time (associate) pastor at a Christian church. Part-time film professor at Rochester Institute of Technology. Husband for 40 years to the lovely and talented Diane. Father to three children and father-in-law to three more amazing people. I preach, teach, counsel, write and plan in my real job. I teach a subject I love at RIT in my "other job," which is a lot of fun most of the time.... I play piano for our local college choir, and sing and play at church occasionally. I also have a film-related website at www.film-prof.com.
This entry was posted in Film-Related Articles and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s